Back into the isolation booth: (see yesterday's post for an explanation)
Why, you ask (ok, so maybe you didn't ask, so I will) isn't the media providing blanket coverage of U.S. military actions in Somalia? NOT IMPORTANT??? Give me a break. No,
The correct answer IS: because the media don't have ANY PICTURES. [This one is a file photo.]
What does that say about media coverage of world events?
That's ok. Maybe we'll be finished before reporters manage to tip off the terrorists.
Why, you ask (ok, so maybe you didn't ask, so I will) isn't the media providing blanket coverage of U.S. military actions in Somalia? NOT IMPORTANT??? Give me a break. No,
The correct answer IS: because the media don't have ANY PICTURES. [This one is a file photo.]
What does that say about media coverage of world events?
That's ok. Maybe we'll be finished before reporters manage to tip off the terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment