That is the heart of the argument between Jon Butzon of the Charleston Education Network (CEN) and CCSD's "director of assessment and evaluation."
Jon, you know that the director must justify her six-figure salary!
In 2010 after a series of exposes in the P&C (imagine that!) the School Board voted to make literacy a priority in the district. Maybe it had assumed literacy already was a priority?
Since then, CCSD has attempted several approaches to the problem, each inching towards success, each unwilling to take the Draconian measures needed for success, namely separating illiterate students from their peers. Moves at the sixth-grade level have been the least effective (see previous statement for effective Draconian meaure).
Now the improved statistics reported by the district do not match those provided by the new (watered-down) PASS, which shows a higher percentage below grade level at every grade. Mmm.
Butzon is quoted as saying that he doesn't "know if they were intentionally deceitful or incompetent, but . . .the data they reported to the board is bad and useless.” The answer to his question is "yes."
How about reporting how many students improved to reading on grade level and the cost per student. That'll be the day.
“I can’t make any sense of this,” Butzon said. “I can’t argue that progress is being made, but we just don’t know how much. This is smoke and mirrors and spinmanship. I have no idea whether we’re getting what we’re supposed to get out of it.”
Donnelly said the report is a reflection of the way in which [unspecified ] educators asked that students’ progress be reported. The report has three tiers, or ranges of students scoring in certain areas, and that’s used in educators’ decisions on who is served by the literacy academies. Students in different percentile ranges receive different help.
Why the resistance to reporting what even non-educators can understand?
What we all can understand is that students reading below grade level at the end of the third grade are virtually guaranteed to become dropouts if they make it to high school.
Posts
1 comment:
I noticed the article said the most gains were in the first grade academies. I wonder how much of that was because it's the age you'd expect to see kids making a good bit of progress anyway. That is, for all I know some percentage of the children assigned to the first grade academies just aren't destined to be early readers; they'll get to grade level whether you intervene or not.
I'm 59, and when I entered first grade at a Catholic school, my teacher didn't expect us to know even one letter of the alphabet. I was the only one in the class who could already read. Nowadays, it seems like a kindergartner who can't read is somehow seen as "behind", when the truth is that can be perfectly normal.
Post a Comment