At the end of the school year. The school managed to dodge the cut-off of district funds several times during the year [see several postings on this blog], but this summer the CCSD School Board will be forced to choose: is it going to fund this school in the future or not? Has the school met its obligations to remain in good standing?
Comparisons have been made between Sea Islands and the new Charter School for Math and Science over the last few months. It's time to take stock. The two charters certainly have been treated differently by the CCSD School Board; that's because, leaving aside differences in their missions, these two charters are entirely different in genesis, motivation, and parental involvement. Perhaps there are some lessons to be learned.
- Sea Islands was encouraged by 75 Calhoun to form under the well-meaning guidance of a former employee of CCSD and friend of 75 Calhoun in order to meet the needs of older at-risk students who would no longer be eligible for Murray Hill Academy because the district changed its policies regarding Murray Hill. The students targeted for YouthBuild were unlikely to have much parental support or involvement in its organization.
- Charter School for Math and Science started as a grass-roots effort among parents of District 20 students who were discouraged by their choices of failing schools. From the beginning, it seems, the CCSD board was miffed that it did not control the actions of this group.
- When the CCSD Board of Trustees approved YouthBuild, it failed in its duty to these needy students by trustingly accepting the word of its organizer that a facility that would meet state standards was available for use. Such was not the case.
- The CCSD Board of Trustees never trusted CSMS in any regard because it hated the idea of a charter high school downtown, with members repeatedly hinting that its organizers were racists. Strong grass-roots support among all races downtown won over public opinion.
- The lack of a building and monthly perambulations of YouthBuild from pillar to post, coupled with lack of busing, guaranteed a major reduction in the number of students in attendance. Meanwhile, the district continued to pay funds based on initial numbers of students. Records of attendance were not made available to the district when requested.
- When CSMS organizers saw the old Rivers High School building sitting vacant and requested its use, the School Board attempted to quash and/or gain control over it by suggesting exorbitant rent, then raising the number of millions needed to bring the building up to standards (never mind that the building had been vacant for a very brief period) to a ridiculous figure.
- Perhaps as part of its agreement with CCSD to keep getting funding despite its not following the rules, Sea Islands did not ask for space in public school buildings, although certainly such space exists. Now it has signed a three-year contract to rent an old warehouse that students themselves will renovate.
Given that expenditure and the signing of a three-year contract, it seems reasonable to assume that the fix is in, even though the Board will be not updated in regard to continuing its support until its meeting later this month.
Taxpayers deserve to know what CCSD has gotten for their money in regard to students at YouthBuild: How many credits have been earned per tax dollar? How many diplomas?
And has CCSD learned its lesson?
3 comments:
Youthbuild has become a joke. They really can't count more than 10 students on enrollment. At the location they were thrown out of they didn't have desks saying desks would be an "earned privledge". HUH!!! It should have been closed the first, second or third time they came before the board. There isn't even a minute comparison between CSMCS and Youthbuild. With the Math and Science Charter their has been true dedication of parents from the get go with Youthbuild, it was simply a way for parents to pawn their kids off to the system. There has been no education going on there and Hillery wants to add it was because they fired his sister from their leadership. He and she should be ashamed that they allowed this travesty to go on this long. Of course Hillery doesn't like it now but only because they bounced his sister. Close the doors, give what money they have left, step aside and let the Math and Science show them how to run a school the right way!
Would someone please clear this up for me. I have been told there is a logical reason that CCSD isn't too hard on charter schools for "at risk" students. That's because once enrolled in a charter school these low performing and low test scoring students are then "off the books" so to speak. Their low test scores would no longer be a liability or counted against the performance of CCSD or its administrators. At the same time CCSD is stronly opposed to charter schools that could potentially attract high performing and high test scoring students away from CCSD controled schools and their higher test scores and levels of academic performance would no longer be counted in favor of CCSD's annual report card as a district. Is this true? If so, doesn't this make a mockery of the testing craze and CCSD's playing games with the whole process? What about how individual kids are succeeding?
CCSD administators recommended to the board earlier this year to close YouthBuild, but the board wanted to keep the school open.
So I dont agree with the earlier post, maybe that is the goal of the board, but the administrators wanted the school closed.
Post a Comment