data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65411/65411df080e8ba6835c1e9d30bd03b1d8a6401d0" alt=""
It seems that Lowcountryblogs took exception to my posting on the whitewater park story (see below). Maybe they need to step back and look at the big picture at the P & C.
Frequently what lands on the front page, I assume at the decision of the editors, is inexplicable, other than by tortuous logic and/or cynical ruminations. If the cynical explanation isn't correct, then I'd like another one that makes sense. [I wasn't the only one to question the logic of "starring" a park in Charlotte--Elsa McDowell fended off another critic in her response column earlier this week, and the editor's explanation quoted there was lame.]
Here's another case. Today's front page has a screaming headline about the cost of expanding the jail ["Jail Price Tag: $101 Million]. Surely the editors knew that the story about the filings load of state judges being the highest in the country was RELATED to the crowding that's going on ["Chief Justice Tells Panel Judges Smothered by Work"]. Yes?
http://charleston.net/assets/webPages/departmental/news/Stories.aspx?section=localnews&tableId=112917&pubDate=10/13/2006
http://charleston.net/assets/webPages/departmental/news/Stories.aspx?section=stateregion&tableId=112902&pubDate=10/13/2006
So, who made the decision to separate the two stories, one for the front page and one for the State and Local section, bottom corner? Couldn't The P & C at least have indicated on the front page that there was a related story inside?
Or are they so dense that they can't figure out that--what was it--something like 80 percent of the prisoners in the jail are waiting to see a judge?
Do you think if we had more state judges we would need less space in the jail?
Duh.
No comments:
Post a Comment