data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7606d/7606daad013af2b61bf1d14fd8082c0765ef48c7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a03e4/a03e43656ec6de47798f4aa4d2f74e820071e0a4" alt=""
Which do YOU think is more important to Charleston and the Lowcountry: that the old Myrtle Beach Pavilion is going to close down or that "even if a cargo terminal isn't built at the former Navy base in North Charleston" in 2013 (that's seven years from now) "sections of I26 will come to a standstill during peak traffic."
http://charleston.net/assets/webPages/departmental/news/Stories.aspx?section=business&tableId=108943&pubDate=9/20/2006
This a dozen years sooner than the previous estimate, yet the news is buried in the largely-ignored (for good reasons) Business section of today's paper (that's 9B) while a large picture and headlines concerning the Myrtle Beach Pavilion were splashed all over the front page of Sunday's paper.
DOES the paper have a responsibility to educate and inform the public?
It won't happen this way.
No comments:
Post a Comment