Take the case of the Summerville High School teacher who was recently charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a student at Summerville High. The salacious details of sexting have been all over the news. [See FormerTeacher Faces Charge in Tuesday's edition of the P&C.]
Apart from the mind-boggling situation with a 25-year-old's behavior, one part of the report does not ring true:
Banner had been at Summerville High for three years but had opted not to continue her contract after the current session ended, said Pat Raynor, public information officer for Dorchester District 2. The district is conducting its own investigation of Banner, she said.Banner thus has been a "former" teacher for a matter of days, not weeks. Misleading headline.
Any teacher will tell you that no teacher in her right mind would give up a job at a school like Summerville High when she was about to get tenure. That is, this was her third year of teaching. If she were to teach there next year, she would have tenure.
Of course, we could argue that since she was not in her right mind over 16-year-old boys, she was not in her right mind in general.
We could, but the most likely scenario is that she was not offered a contract for next year.
Why? Does Pat Raynor know more than she is saying? How about a little transparency?
No comments:
Post a Comment